首页> 外文OA文献 >Differences in learning rates for item and associative memories between amnestic mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls
【2h】

Differences in learning rates for item and associative memories between amnestic mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls

机译:Differences in learning rates for item and associative memories between amnestic mild cognitive impairment and healthy controls

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Background: It has been established that the overall performance of associative memory was disproportionately impaired in contrast to item memory in aMCI (Amnestic mild cognitive impairment) patients, but little is known about the specific aspects of the memory process that show differences between aMCI and healthy controls. By comparing an item-item associative learning test with an individual item learning test, the present study investigated whether the rate of learning was slower in associative memory than in item memory in aMCI. Furthermore, we examined whether deficits in intertrial acquisition and consolidation contributed to the potential disproportionate impairments in the learning rate of associative memory for aMCI patients. In addition, we further explored whether the aMCI-discriminative power of the associative memory test increases more than that of the item memory test when the number of learning-test trials increases. Methods: A group of 40 aMCI patients and 40 matched control participants were administered a standardized item memory test (Auditory Verbal Learning Test, AVLT) and a standardized associative memory test (Paired Associative Learning Test, PALT), as well as other neuropsychological tests and clinical assessments. Results: The results indicated that the learning rate deficits in aMCI patients were more obvious for associative memory than for item memory and that the deficits resulted from impairments in both intertrial acquisition and consolidation. In addition, the receiver operating characteristic curve and logistical regression analysis revealed that the discriminative power of the associative memory test for aMCI was larger than that of the item memory test, especially with more than one learning-test trials. Conclusions: Due to more deficits in learning rate of associative memory than that of item memory, the discriminative power for aMCI tended to be larger in associative memory than in item memory when the number of learning-test trials increased. It is suggested that associative memory tests with multiple trials may be particularly useful for early detection of aMCI.
机译:背景:已经确定,与aMCI(失忆性轻度认知障碍)患者的项目记忆相比,联想记忆的整体表现不成比例地受到损害,但是对于记忆过程的特定方面知之甚少,这些方面显示出aMCI和健康者之间的差异控件。通过将项目-项目联想学习测试与单个项目学习测试进行比较,本研究调查了联想记忆的学习速度是否比aMCI中的项目记忆慢。此外,我们检查了间质获取和合并的缺陷是否导致aMCI患者联想记忆学习率的潜在不成比例的损害。此外,我们进一步探讨了随着学习测试次数的增加,联想记忆测试的aMCI判别力是否比项目记忆测试的增加。方法:一组40例aMCI患者和40名匹配的对照参与者接受了标准化的项目记忆测试(听觉语言学习测试,AVLT)和标准化的联想记忆测试(配对联想学习测试,PALT),以及其他神经心理学测试和临床评估。结果:结果表明,aMCI患者的学习率缺陷比联想记忆更明显,联想记忆比项目记忆更明显,并且这种缺陷是由间质获取和合并障碍引起的。此外,接受者的工作特征曲线和逻辑回归分析表明,aMCI联想记忆测验的判别力大于项目记忆测验的判别力,尤其是在一项以上的学习测验中。结论:由于联想记忆的学习率缺陷比项目记忆的缺陷更多,因此随着学习测试试验次数的增加,联想记忆的判别力往往大于联想记忆。建议进行多次试验的联想记忆测试对于aMCI的早期检测可能特别有用。

著录项

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号